<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Food Safety Lawyer &#187; campylobacter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/tag/campylobacter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 22:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Raw Milk is Inherently Unsafe and Responsible for Repeated Outbreaks</title>
		<link>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2011/06/raw-milk-is-inherently-unsafe-and-responsible-for-repeated-outbreaks/</link>
		<comments>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2011/06/raw-milk-is-inherently-unsafe-and-responsible-for-repeated-outbreaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Pritzker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campylobacter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campylobacter raw milk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw milk outbreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin campylobacter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my line of work representing victims of foodborne illness, I have frequent contact with food safety experts including microbiologists, epidemiologists, sanitarians and infectious disease physicians. Not once have any of these experts ever recommended consumption of raw milk. Why? Because EXPERTS, the people who have studied, trained, conducted experiments, treated patients and written peer-reviewed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-111" title="Raw Milk Campylobacter" src="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Raw-milk-campylobacter.jpg" alt="" width="193" height="290" />In my line  of work representing victims of foodborne illness, I have frequent contact with  food safety experts including microbiologists, epidemiologists, sanitarians and  infectious disease physicians. Not once have any of these experts ever  recommended consumption of raw milk.</p>
<p>Why?  Because <em>EXPERTS</em>, the people who have studied, trained, conducted  experiments, treated patients and written peer-reviewed articles (not  pseudo-scientists who <em>BELIEVE </em>something to be true), know that raw milk  is inherently unsafe.  Raw milk is responsible for repeated outbreaks and will  continue to cause injury and death no matter what its proponents claim to the  contrary.</p>
<p>Need proof?  Look no further than this month’s raw milk outbreak involving fourth graders at  a public school in Wisconsin.</p>
<p>In Racine  County, Wisconsin a parent (!) brought raw milk to a school event. Sixteen  people, including at least nine children, were poisoned with <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/campylobacter/"><em>Campylobactor  jejuni</em></a> bacteria after  consuming the donated milk.</p>
<p>According to Wisconsin  officials, this incredibly stupid action on the parent’s part was not illegal.  Apparently, any person who lawfully purchases raw milk can give it away to  anyone with impunity.</p>
<p>Proponents claim that  consumption of raw milk is healthful, nutritious and a matter of personal  choice. Their argument is that if a person knows of the risk (which they claim  is de minimis) and chooses to encounter it, it is that person’s choice and the  state should not intrude.</p>
<p>Fair enough. Except,  that a) there is no proof raw milk is healthier than pasteurized milk; b) the  risks associated with raw milk are not de minimis; c) when people become ill  from raw milk, as some inevitably will, we all (not just the victim) have to pay  for it, and d) as this case tragically illustrates, “freedom of choice” does  not prevent innocent children from being harmed.</p>
<p>According  to a Wisconsin newspaper, “bills to legalize the  sale of unpasteurized milk have been introduced in the Legislature in the past.  One passed last year, but former Gov. Jim Doyle vetoed it citing the danger to  public health.” Enough said.</p>
<p><em>Attorney Fred Pritzker represents <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/campylobacter/campylobacteriosis.html">campylobacteriosis</a> victims and their families nationwide. He is currently representing a man who consumed raw milk contaminated with Campylobacter, developed <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/campylobacter/guillain-barre-syndrome.html">Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)</a> and is now paralyzed. Mr. Pritzker can be reached at 1-888-377-8900 (toll free) or by <a href="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/contact/">submitting our contact form</a>.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Raw+Milk+is+Inherently+Unsafe+and+Responsible+for+Repeated+Outbreaks+http%3A%2F%2Fthefoodsafetylawyer.com%2F%3Fp%3D758" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Raw+Milk+is+Inherently+Unsafe+and+Responsible+for+Repeated+Outbreaks+http%3A%2F%2Fthefoodsafetylawyer.com%2F%3Fp%3D758" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2011/06/raw-milk-is-inherently-unsafe-and-responsible-for-repeated-outbreaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The High Cost of E. coli and Salmonella Food Poisoning</title>
		<link>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2010/05/the-high-cost-of-e-coli-and-salmonella-food-poisoning/</link>
		<comments>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2010/05/the-high-cost-of-e-coli-and-salmonella-food-poisoning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Pritzker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campylobacter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E. coli O157]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmonella poisoning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans pay about $3.13 billion a year in costs incurred each year by Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7 alone, according to the University of Minnesota&#8217;s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP). The center is reporting figures gathered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS). As seen in the chart [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ecoli-bacteria.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-563" title="ecoli-bacteria" src="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ecoli-bacteria.jpg" alt="e. coli lawsuit lawyer" width="200" height="157" /></a><strong>Americans pay about $3.13 billion a year in costs incurred each year by <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com//salmonella/"><em>Salmonella </em></a>and <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/escherichia-coli-O157/"><em>E. coli</em> O157:H7</a> alone</strong>, <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/fs/food-disease/news/may2410costest.html">according to the University of Minnesota&#8217;s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP)</a>.</p>
<p>The center is reporting figures gathered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS). As seen in the chart below, the ERS used estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), to come up with cost estimates for both E. coli and Salmonella cases annually. The numbers for Salmonella costs are based on the CDC&#8217;s estimate of almost <strong>1.4 million <em>Salmonella</em> cases each year</strong>, which includes <strong>415 deaths</strong>. The <strong>average cost per case is an estimated $1,896</strong>.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#cccccc">
<th width="50%" align="left">Pathogen</th>
<th width="25%" align="center">CDC estimate of annual number of cases</th>
<th width="25%" align="center">ERS cost estimate<br />
(2009 dollars)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/Images/go_arrow.png" alt="" width="10" height="10" /> <em>Campylobacter</em> (foodborne sources)</td>
<td align="right">2,000,000</td>
<td align="right"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/salm_Intro.asp"><img src="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/Images/go_arrow.png" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="10" /></a> <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/salm_Intro.asp"><em>Salmonella</em></a> (all sources)</td>
<td align="right">1,397,187</td>
<td align="right">$2,649,413,401</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/ecoli_Intro.asp"><img src="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/Images/go_arrow.png" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="10" /></a> <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/ecoli_Intro.asp">Shiga toxin-producing <em>E. coli</em> O157 (STEC O157)</a> (all sources)</td>
<td align="right">73,480</td>
<td align="right">$478,381,766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/Images/go_arrow.png" alt="" width="10" height="10" /> Non-O157 shiga toxin-producing <em>E. coli</em> (non-STEC O157) (all sources)</td>
<td align="right">31,229</td>
<td align="right"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/Images/go_arrow.png" alt="" width="10" height="10" /> <em>Listeria</em> (all sources)</td>
<td align="right">2,797</td>
<td align="right"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/salmonella-4.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-79" title="salmonella-4" src="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/salmonella-4.jpg" alt="salmonella lawsuit" width="250" height="188" /></a>The CDC numbers of <strong><em>E coli</em> O157 cases are significantly lower, at 73,480 cases a year</strong> with <strong>61 deaths</strong>, however the <strong>per-case cost of $6,510</strong> is much higher than Salmonella cases.</p>
<p>According to CIDRAP:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The ERS has posted an online <a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodborneIllness/#2010-5-17">&#8220;Foodborne Illness Cost Calculator&#8221;</a> that allows Web users to come up with their own estimates of the cost of foodborne illnesses for a state or region or for a given outbreak. The ERS&#8217;s estimates, which have been used in cost-benefit and impact analyses, include assumptions about disease incidence, outcome severity, and medical and productivity costs.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Currently the only pathogens available in the calculator are Salmonella and E. coli O157, however, the ERS is planning on adding <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com//listeria/">Listeria</a>, <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com//campylobacter/">Campylobacter</a>, and other strains of E. coli (non-0157 shiga toxin-producing E. coli such as<a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/section-foodborne-illness/ecoli/ecoli-O111.html"> ecoli 0111</a> and <a href="http://www.pritzkerlaw.com/ecoli/ecoli-o145.html">E. coli 0145</a>). The types of costs taken into consideration by the USDA&#8217;s ERS include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Medical costs</li>
<li>Time missed from work due to illness</li>
<li>Cost of premature death</li>
</ul>
<p>However, they do NOT include costs such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Pain and suffering</li>
<li>Travel</li>
<li>Child care</li>
</ul>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>A <a href="http://foodpoisoning.pritzkerlaw.com/archives/food-safety-food-poisoning-lawsuits-medical-care-lost-productivity-cost-152-billion-a-year.html">similar report</a> released in March by The Produce Safety Project, an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts at Georgetown University, estimated much higher numbers, with a total cost of $152 billion per year for all pathogens, $14.6 billion for Salmonella and $993 million for E. coli 0157.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=The+High+Cost+of+E.+coli+and+Salmonella+Food+Poisoning+http%3A%2F%2Fthefoodsafetylawyer.com%2F%3Fp%3D577" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=The+High+Cost+of+E.+coli+and+Salmonella+Food+Poisoning+http%3A%2F%2Fthefoodsafetylawyer.com%2F%3Fp%3D577" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefoodsafetylawyer.com/2010/05/the-high-cost-of-e-coli-and-salmonella-food-poisoning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

